Key California Employment Law Cases: April 2022
Key California Employment Law Cases: April 2022
Recent highlights:
1. On W&L Nevada's motion, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of W&L Nevada, holding that it was not a covered employer under the ADA because (1) it had fewer than 15 employees, and (2) Plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether W&L Nevada was an integrated enterprise with its counterpart in California.
2. Facts: Plaintiff Amy Buchanan filed suit against Defendant Watkins & Letofsky, LLP (W&L Nevada), a Nevada limited liability partnership, under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and state law
#biyro #game #sports #attorney #balling
More: https://biyro.com/blog/freelance/key-california-employment-law-cases-april-2022/
Recent highlights:
1. On W&L Nevada's motion, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of W&L Nevada, holding that it was not a covered employer under the ADA because (1) it had fewer than 15 employees, and (2) Plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether W&L Nevada was an integrated enterprise with its counterpart in California.
2. Facts: Plaintiff Amy Buchanan filed suit against Defendant Watkins & Letofsky, LLP (W&L Nevada), a Nevada limited liability partnership, under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and state law
#biyro #game #sports #attorney #balling
More: https://biyro.com/blog/freelance/key-california-employment-law-cases-april-2022/
Comments
Post a Comment